The two most important types of logic on the LSAT are conditional and causal reasoning. Conditional reasoning may be phrased in various ways, but it can be essentially reduced to if-then statements.

Even the best of intentions, however, can lead a judge or attorney down the wrong path — and one misstep or misunderstanding may lead the judge or attorney to face the barrel of a bar complaint.

The state bar's committee of bar examiners said provisional licenses should be offered to anyone who withdrew from the ...

Harvard University has hired another law firm to help it navigate a U.S. House investigation into its response to claims of ...

The ABA, established in the late 1800s, has grown into a sprawling organization that touts a membership of over 400,000 legal workers.

The California State Bar leaders who oversaw the February Bar Exam that glitched and crashed widely must now decide how to ...

California Bar exam catastrophe, USF Law professor Katie Moran reviews the exam blunders and says the California Bar should ...

The battle continues. In Part One, we examined how six advanced AI reasoning models from OpenAI and Google tackled a real Bar ...

Legal tech has the power to transform the profession, but it must be implemented thoughtfully, with rigorous checks and ...

In legal practice, time spent in client meetings, drafting documents, doing legal research and completing tasks directly ...

The California State Bar must be held accountable, not just for its catastrophic failure in administering this exam, but for ...

After California’s bar exams were plagued last week with technical ... choice questions that mirrored those we saw in the practice questions published this past fall, as well as disruptive ...